Refunds — The Silent Killer of Subscription Engineering
This blog uncovers why refunds, often treated as a minor support feature in subscription products, are actually one of the most complex engineering challenges at scale. It walks through a real-world scenario where a fast-growing digital startup stumbles into chaos due to underestimated refund mechanics — from financial ledger mismatches, multi-system rollback issues, coupon and affiliate payout reversals, abuse loops, cross-financial-year tax complications, to analytics corruption and unexpected international chargebacks.
Yash Sharma
Welcome to my blog! I write about technology, development, and more.
When you’re building a subscription product, your engineering roadmap is usually filled with the exciting stuff like onboarding, payments, engagement loops, dashboards, retention hacks.
Refunds barely make the cut. It’s “just” User clicks refund → cancel → done.
It starts harmlessly
A user says: “Not happy. Please refund.”
We cancel their subscription, flip a flag in our database, notify payments, and move on with our lives. Simple.
But then support escalations began piling up. Finance started panicking. Engineering realised we’d massively underestimated the complexity hiding beneath the surface.
The rabbit hole we fell into
-
Invoice reversal wasn’t enough
Payment gateway shows money returned. But our financial system still shows revenue booked. Tax ledgers didn’t sync back. Nightly jobs started showing negative spikes in MRR. Accounting went ballistic during audits. -
Crossing financial years? Nightmare.
Refund on April 3rd (financial year B) for a subscription bought on March 29th (financial year A).
Do we adjust tax filings for the previous year or the current one? Compliance fragility unlocked. -
Subscription rollback across every system
Marketing was still emailing the user as “active”. CRM still showed them “premium”. Dashboard still gave content access… because we only cancelled in the payment system. -
Multi-account abuse
Users exploited our 7-day refund by creating multiple accounts, binge-consuming content, refunding, repeating.
One user consumed ₹40,000 worth of content for ₹0. -
Coupons, credits & affiliates
Bought with an influencer coupon during a campaign → Do we refund full amount or just what user paid?
Already paid affiliate commission → do we claw it back?
Most systems are not designed to reverse outward payouts. -
Chargebacks — the ultimate curveball
International users can dispute payments up to 180 days later. Card networks yank funds without warning long after our internal refund window closed, and even after the financial year ended. -
Analytics distortion
Growth dashboard says:
“Revenue: +₹20L | New Subs: +2000 → MoM Growth: 15% 🚀”
But refunds aren’t reflected real-time → MRR wildly inaccurate → Wrong numbers go to investors → Chaos.
The brutal truth we learnt
Refunds aren’t a support function.
Refunds are a product + engineering + finance workflow, impacting subscriptions, ledgers, accounting, taxation, growth, analytics, and fraud operations.
If you’re building subscriptions… please solve this early
- Build bidirectional sync (payment gateway ↔ finance system).
- Treat refunds as a state machine, not just a boolean flag.
- Capture reason codes, track repeat refunders, flag abuse rings.
- Reverse coupons, credits, affiliate payouts, analytics atomically.
- Build chargeback defense workflows (+ documentation & experiments).
- Don’t just cancel subscriptions — cancel them in every system connected to it.
**Because once you scale… refunds won’t be a feature.
They’ll be a fire.** 🔥
More articles you might like
Rate Limiting — The Day We Throttled Our Own App
This blog tells the story of a SaaS company that introduced rate limiting to stop bot abuse on its public APIs only to accidentally throttle its own internal microservices. What began as a simple protection mechanism using a sliding-window algorithm soon spiraled into a self-inflicted denial-of-service when internal service calls were routed through the same rate-limited gateway, triggering cascading retries and system-wide failures. The narrative highlights how defensive systems like rate limiting must be context-aware and tested against internal traffic not just external threats and emphasizes that poorly tuned safeguards can end up harming the platform they’re meant to protect.
The Silent Migration: How Salesforce Moved 760+ Kafka Nodes Without a Single Drop
This blog recounts Salesforce’s massive engineering feat of migrating 760+ Kafka nodes handling 1 million+ messages per second, all with zero downtime and no data loss. Told in a story-like war-room style, it highlights the challenges of moving from CentOS to RHEL and consolidating onto Salesforce’s Ajna Kafka platform. The narrative walks through how the team orchestrated the migration with mixed-mode clusters, strict validations, checksum-based integrity checks, and live dashboards. In the end, it showcases how a seemingly impossible migration was achieved smoothly proving that large-scale infrastructure upgrades are less about brute force and more about meticulous planning, safety nets, and engineering discipline.
Forgot Password? The Hidden Identity Nightmare
What starts as a basic two-step flow, user requests a reset, clicks a link, sets a new password, quickly spirals into complex challenges like brute-forceable OTPs, token misuse on shared devices, old reset links that never expire, and lack of GDPR-grade logging.